ANALISIS INSTITUCIONAL LOURAU PDF
December 25, 2019 | by admin
Home Rene Lourau Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Stock Image. Analisis Institucional (Biblioteca de Sociologia) (Spanish Edition). QR code for Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Title, Análisis institucional y socioanálisis. Contributor, René Lourau. Publisher, Nueva Imagen, Tercera, el cambio institucional ha sido no sólo continuo, sino inusualmente dicha teoría considera al individuo como la unidad básica de análisis y, por el otro, . “elemento objetivo del sistema jurídico” de Hauriou (Lourau, 9, 62).
|Published (Last):||25 February 2011|
|PDF File Size:||3.69 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It never precedes our gaze, because it is the effect of instituiconal. The universal collapses and judgments give way to other ways of working.
Books by Rene Lourau
Instiucional author as a protagonist. References Castro, E In their speech “they do not know the history of people and they take any story as true”. Amid the numerous considerations built up in a group education policies, pedagogical training, the established relationship with the class, the singularity that crosses the norms, the affective bonds, the differences in relation to the administrative procedures have been reworking the lived scene and bringing virtualities. Many scenes are not composed by speech, but by instiitucional, by feeling, by silence, by desire, and any element can participate.
The analysis can only be creative if it is free to circulate institjcional possibilities not perceived or not summoned in the act of registration.
While the practices take the experiences into individual plans, the diary analyzes the relationships, questioning why the grandmother’s story deserves immediate credit and punitive effects on the mother.
Books by Rene Lourau (Author of مفاتيح علم الاجتماع)
Unlike the concept of “social fact” proposed by Durkheim, who grounds the positivist method, the field diary proposed by institutional insfitucional and in the light of Michel Foucault’s concept of event does not attribute any value to any episode, act and situation. The fact precedes the action and perception of the individual.
In the tutelary council it is usual to take as true the version that presents itself in the first moment.
This article presents some analyses of intervention indtitucional carried out in schools and tutorial councils, taking two references as methodological basis: The process necessary to deconstruct the prisons of the instituted is long, demanding from us the reinvention through practices of intervention to think what is fixed and naturalized in the world.
Objectivity as a counterpoint to subjective production is the separation between act and affection, summoned in front of a record of something distant, cold, technical, inconceivable when the ways of perceiving lead to the record written or not of an act. Therefore, the implication analysis is a permanent process of denaturalization of institutions. The analysis is done to understand how the fact was produced and why, as a universal reality, to coerce those who are submitted to it.
Concerned with the premise that the institutionalization of relationships legitimates their ways of functioning and, therefore, calls people to join them without questioning them, these authors propose both a conceptual analysis and a construction of techniques to subsidize a professional practice that makes the habits, the annoyances, the powerful silences and the whispers, into tools of intervention.
The inxtitucional of the author of the diary is in the conduct of instltucional that may have been understood as a particular situation, an action of a professional or a team, but it becomes a social event and historically referenced, even when loaded with singularities, because it was the analysis of their own implications.
ANÁLISIS INSTITUCIONAL by Maritza Valdez on Prezi
By this logic, an institution would be a historical form produced and reproduced by social practices that are becoming naturalized and that affirm truths that are instituted, codified, that create regulations and norms, losing their historical reference. Thus, to define a situation as a fact, to register it and to approach it in a certain way, all this is part of a certain historically constructed subjective production that composes the field of the political.
All between and Its wealth is not in teaching to do right or better, since the performance can always be another, since life is intensity and chance. Paradoxes between the analysis and the criticism The field diary is a technical instrument that produces an intervention in the reality in question by problematizing both what is called analysis and how it should be done. Compulsory schooling, the ways in which relationships are established in this family, the imposition by the school of family tasks as a condition for the performance of pedagogical activities It puts on the scene everything and everyone who in writing emerges as participants, summoning them to contribute to the analysis through their speeches, practices or the bonds that the problematizations create.
Faced with a grandmother who arrives at the council complaining that the child’s mother louraj negligent, the counselor, without any consultation with the mother for being taken by the urgency that the report provokes, issues responsibility for this grandmother. It should be said: Even an act conducted personally is crossed by norms, affections, conditions, circumstances that take the professional practice off the heroic scene.
Next, the mother comes to the board demanding the child back. Analyzing each perception, shuddering truths, is a bet in the understanding of the logics that sustains analiisis practices read by our gaze, before judging their truth or qualifying the agreements. The implication analysis refuses the analysts’ neutrality.
However, it was in the diary’s writing that the predictable lost focus, disrupting the normalized places. Intervention that is not given as an adjustment of the diary’s author in the professional practice his and his colleagues’but as a movement to think the fundamentals that led the practices: When discussing the written and oral records of practices in the intervention fields during the internship supervisions, it is difficult for those who narrate their experiences to depart from the logic of judgment, since the debate that is built up in the collective may suggest that the performance in the presented event could have been in many other ways.
In this way, it shows that in the midst of the truths considered absolute – the instituted – there are gaps, experiments that are not yet palpable, which causes differences: For the latter, every act-fact is always reality in movement, being made and embodied by the analysis. It is up to the socioanalytic intervention to conduct the analysis process, making sure that the displacements detach themselves from the identity perspective. Collective because it is the processes that constitute us, that are present and drive the perceptions fixed on paper.
We do not judge, we put it into analysis. From this perspective, the exercise of writing problematizes how we affect ourselves, our strangeness and difficulties, allowing us to stir up the instituted. It could have been another way because we did not work with technical instructions, manuals of procedures, verifiable truths, but with relationships immersed in valued spontaneities and put into analysis in their implications.
The experience is not a mistake or an accomplishment and makes us think, exchange ideas, lead a collective movement to build other possibilities. Socioanalytic intervention as an internship practice.